Beer Marketer's Insights
Correction
Troegs to NC, New Storage Spot; Heavy Seas Boosting Brewhouse Size; Large Track 7 Move Pennsy's Troegs Brewing announced entrance in NC market slated for September, along with additional 55K sq-ft storage facility in nearby Elizabethtown, according to Penn Live. NC will be first new Troegs market in about 5 yrs, adding to distribution in 8 states plus DC. Also in Mid-Atlantic region, Heavy Seas shared status of new brewhouse at Maryland plant with fans this week: new system nearly triples daily brewing capacity to between 500-600 bbls/day and should be operational early next month, according to brewery newsletter. Out west, Sacramento's Track 7 just signed lease on new 35K sq-ft facility coming off of production of 1200 bbls in 2013, reports Sacramento Bee. Founded in 2011, Track 7 will keep working at current smaller spot with tasting room then open new facility with initial capacity around 8000 bbls, likely to get much bigger. Track 7 signed on with Markstein to distribute locally back in Feb, with expectation to hit 2800 bbls by end of 2014.
DUI (Not TM) Lawyers Served Suit for Seeming Straight-Up Repurpose of Full Sail's "Session" Mark
Harpoon joined New Belgium, Full Sail, Alaskan, Deschutes (and possibly others) going ESOP route to resolve succession/ownership issues. Original shareholder group transferred 48% of ownership to ESOP, Harpoon announced today. Remaining 52% still in hands of co-founder Dan Kenary, who now becomes CEO, and 6 other long-term shareholders, Dan told CBN earlier today. The other co-founder, Rich Doyle, steps down from CEO role, but will remain on hand part-time to focus on "key marketing and sales initiatives" as well as new biz development. Rich is "built into the DNA of Harpoon and always will be," Dan said. No other mgmt changes on tap.
Harpoon started looking at succession/ownership issues about 2 ½ yrs ago, Dan said, then dropped it for a while, but revisited about a year ago. "All successful private businesses face the same transition/ownership issues," Dan pointed out, and with he and Rich having been "at it for a long time" (nearly 30 yrs), in their mid-50s and constantly facing questions about Harpoon's future, they needed to make decision. They looked at all the "regular suspects": going public, strategic buyers, private equity, next generation, etc. They did not want to go public, Harpoon isn't a family biz (they decided long ago) and Dan didn't like prospect of driving by the brewery in 5 yrs and seeing it owned by foreign brewer. ESOP "met the needs of liquidity, continuity and providing a solid framework for the future." Also, it "fits beautifully" with Harpoon's culture, its local focus and "our incredible group of employees." Dan introduced the employees to the "strangers in suits" (lawyers and bankers) at emotional mtg at brewery last night. Said he wanted to introduce employees to new owners and asked everyone to turn to person next to them and shake his or her hand as those new owners. Tears and cheers followed. Employees always felt like owners, Dan said. Mgmt challenge is to "drill down" fact that they now are owners. Finally, ESOP route a good fit for craft biz in general, Dan added, given combo of collaborative culture and local roots with resistance to private equity, big/foreign brewer ownership. "I'll think we'll see a bunch more" going ESOP, Dan predicted.
"We Will Run the Business As We Always Have," Sez Dan While ESOP creates a bit of a "convoluted structure," Dan acknowledged, decision-making process no more complicated now than last week. ESOP trustee is appointed by the board but not on the board. All indications so far suggest "we will run the business as we always have, but the employees will benefit in the future in a more tangible way." Previously, key decisions were made by group of senior sales and other execs. Decisions now will be made by same folks, said Dan. Then too, "Rich is not leaving the conversation." Let's hope not, since Rich has been one of the more outspoken, upfront veteran craft brewer execs. Recall that at last November's Beer INSIGHTS Seminar Rich teed up some comments that became key topics in early 2014. "Resistance to [franchise law] carve-outs is a mistake," Rich said then, noting accommodations like the NY law, which he called a "firebreak," and "much better than a forest fire." He also pointed to small brewers' growing political presence and advised keeping internecine industry squabbles out of the public eye, themes that many industry execs picked up earlier this yr.
How's Harpoon's Biz So Far in 2014? "A bit sluggish in the first half," Dan told us. Up low to mid-single digits thru Jun, tho Jun itself +10% and Jul so far strong. "We're bullish" on the rest of the year. Harpoon, like everyone in Mass, took hit from Yuengling intro there in Mar, which "sucked the oxygen out of the market for a while." He thinks Yuengling volume came from both craft and mainstream as there was "plenty of experimentation." Is Harpoon's draft getting smacked, like some other established players, via rotator bars and others seeking new? It's "market by market," with taps harder to hold in some places than others. Constant craving for new "will have to play itself out," in Dan's view: "I'm not sure who it benefits." Harpoon hasn't added new states in 5 yrs (it's in 26). Any new markets on the horizon? "Nothing planned," said Dan.
It's Only Natural for AB to Defend "Natty," Sez Atty; Predicts Craft Brewer Name Change; Harvester
Interestingly, AB has been thru this once already. Back in 2006, Pabst sought to trademark "Natty Boh," oft-used moniker for its Baltimore-based National Bohemian brand. AB filed similar opposition. But local folks had been referring to Natty Boh since late 50s, Pabst pointed out, well before Natty Light even conceived. Michels called that a "reverse judo chop," noting AB actually "ended up jeopardizing its Natty Light registration." As most of these issues do, the parties settled. Pabst rescinded its trademark application, but still uses the phrase on its website and in its mktg. Michels suggested there may have been some money paid out. But "outcome makes sense since AB makes nationwide use of the Natty Light mark while 90% of Natty Boh's sales are in Baltimore."
Will that outcome "save" Natty Greene's trademark application? "Probably not," opines Michel. Natty G doesn't have same "previous use" argument that Pabst had and will have to argue there's no likely confusion between the Nattys. Indeed, "we're going to stand firm in our belief that there's no confusion between General Nathanael Greene and what [AB is] alleging," Kayne told the tv reporter. But Michel calls that a "tall order" and predicts a settlement. "Real fight," in his eyes, is whether AB requires Natty Greene's to "stop all uses of the Natty mark. This would require Natty Greene's to change the name of its business to, say, Nathanael Greene's." That's his bet. Ironically, while Natty Greene's may have to lengthen its name, Natty Light went in opposite direction. Beer vets may recall AB originally called the brand Anheuser Busch Natural Light.
Harvester Brewing Turns to Fans for New Name Speaking of name changes, Oregon-based gluten-free Harvester Brewing seeks input from fans for a new name after being asked to stop using the moniker by Hope Family Wines. While trademark disputes between beer companies seem to be popping up every other day, this charge of potential confusion from a winery indicates growing importance of looking beyond beer into other alc bevs when vetting new brand names.

