Beer Marketer's Insights
Phusion Projects Looks to Double in 2 Yrs; Starts “Innovative Brewing”; Craft Acquisitions?
“The vehicle for accomplishing those [growth] goals is a new wholly owned subsidiary called Innovative Brewing” that is “being set up to acquire fledgling companies that could use a distribution boost,” according to Crain’s. Potential deals could be for “nano-brewers looking to grow to the next level or a craft spirits producer…. They hope to close on a first acquisition this month.” No further details at presstime. Phusion has 90 employees. This May it intro’d an FMB called Loka Rita, following last yr’s intros of its pouch platform Island Squeeze and Moskato Life.
Don’t know whether this helped beer biz last yr, but couldn’t have hurt. Expansion was widespread: 43 states and DC saw outlet increases, according to Bureau of Labors Stats compiled by Natl Restaurant Assn. Most new entrants came in biggest states, natch: Fla (1,751), Calif (1,721), Tex (1,296). But Tenn had biggest % jump, +9%. And Indy, Minn and La joined Fla with gains of 3.5% or more, NRA pointed out. Interestingly, NJ was biggest net loser, with 111 fewer outlets in 2012 than previous yr. Hurricane Sandy likely a been factor, but also very tuff and very expensive to obtain liquor licenses in NJ. Similarly, Mass regs limit licenses, especially in Boston, and state lost 66 outlets last yr.
CM also notes the key exceptions (c-stores, CM affiliates, hotel chains, sponsored events) and that “there is no obligation to modify existing supply arrangements” tho “any new agreement shall be executed pursuant to these commitments.” Why not bar all exclusives? Commission acknowledged exclusives could create “barriers to market entry” for other brewers but also noted that the arrangements can help retailers be more efficient and help them with financing and expansion, the Wall St Journal reported. Given that Modelo and CM will still be able to have a significant portion of their bizzes in exclusive outlets, and the other exceptions, probably no surprise that SABMiller, whose complaint prompted the action, “declined to comment,” according to Reuters.
Brewers Turn for GABF Disappointment
Once small manufacturers attract workers (since those employers "typically pay workers more than service businesses") and turn around a neighborhood, those manufacturers can be overrun by land-developers looking to put in more lucrative buildings. "We sowed the seeds of our own demise here," Brooklyn founder Steve Hindy explained. He's already "worried," the article notes, "that the company will get kicked out of its warehouse" when its lease ends in 2025. Harpoon, on the other hand, "recently negotiated a 50-yr lease with the city." But 21st Amendment's brewpub in San Francisco may already be as big as it's going to get. Now that the famously-contract brewing co is searching for an 80K sq-ft brewery to call its own, it's looking to "help anchor the revitalization" of an area across the bay, in Oakland, founder Nico Freccia told AP. Elsewhere, some urban neighborhoods are becoming veritable brewing districts in their own right, like the Ballard section of Seattle, where Hale's Ales and Maritime Pacific opened in the 90s and "six breweries have sprung up in the last two years." Just like in Williamsburg, South Boston, and Cleveland, "higher-income apartment buildings" alongside "restaurants and nightlife" have moved in. Click here to read the AP story.
It's no wonder then that some struggling smaller communities see dollar signs when presented with brewing biz proposals. That's the story in tiny Bridgman, Mich, a lake town whose population doubles from its usual 2300 during the summer months. The city manager explained that a brewpub opening soon downtown is "a cornerstone of the redevelopment of downtown," according to the Kalamazoo Gazette. Tapistry Brewing, already available at retail and on tap, got $40K from the city as well as a USDA Rural Business Enterprise Grant earlier in the year to help refurbish an old hardware store. And the Bridgman community hopes that'll only be the beginning, envisioning moving a car dealership to make space for "a $10-$12 million, mixed-use residential and storefront building." It's also providing "overwhelming community support" to Tapistry, one of its founders, Joe Rudnick, explained, adding that "our No. 1 goal is to make this downtown thrive."
Craft-loving Vermont saw the largest increase, +9% from just slightly above the national avg to well above it at 35.3 gals. Vermont is followed closely by North Dakota, +8% to the highest avg per capita beer consumption rate, 45.8 gals, with the recent increase driven by the oil boom there, no doubt. Interestingly, Vermont has the lowest capita per brewery rate, according to Brewers Association stats, its 25 breweries serving about 25K Vermonters each in 2012. North Dakota's 4 breweries served almost 7 times that many residents. Other states that increased consumption from 2007 to 2012 include Maine, a fairly craft-friendly state where beer suppliers outside of the top 5 (AB, MC, Pabst, Crown, Heineken) have added 6.7 share growing to 27.8 in the same time frame. So two of the most craft-centric states had among the best per capita trends over the last decade.
That belies the notion that as consumers drink more craft, they're drinking less total beer. Look at two other craft-centric states: Oregon and Colorado. In 2002, Oregonians consumed slightly more beer per capita than the national average. The state's per capita beer consumption then increased to about 2 gals above the national avg in 2007 before dipping 6.5% to 30.3 gals last yr (just 0.3 gals less than the 2002 stat). Per capita consumption dropped less in Oreg than the national avg as craft continued its ascent and smaller suppliers gained 6 full share between 2007 and 2012. In Colo, consumption dropped 7.1% in 5 years (less than avg) and 13% in 10 (more than avg) as dozens more brewers took root and gained share.
States with the largest drops in consumption since 2007 were Nevada, Washington and Florida: 3 beer markets of widely varying sizes, craft production and brewery counts, as well as small supplier share and share trends. While "all others" gained 2.9 share in Fla from 2007-2012, more than doubling, per capita consumption dropped 15% from above to below the national avg, as many construction workers lost their jobs and left. Nevada's per capita number fluctuates with tourism, also a factor in Fla. Washington's per capita consumption has shifted up and down over the last 10 yrs, but has remained steadily below avg. But ownership changes and a major tax hike for large suppliers compounded continued growth of craft there. Across our analysis of various indicators of craft growth, not a single one proved effective in predicting state-level consumption trends. Instead, myriad factors affect these stats, not least of which are broader economic trends, individual state tax code changes and wine and spirits consumption.
| Per Capita Consumption (gals) | "All Others" Mkt Share | |||||
| State | 2002 | 2007 | 2012 | 10-yr % chg | 2007 | 2012 |
| Vermont | 31.7 | 32.4 | 35.3 | 11.4 | 26.4 | 36.2 |
| North Dakota | 43.0 | 42.4 | 45.8 | 6.5 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
| Maine | 30.6 | 32.8 | 34.0 | 11.1 | 21.1 | 27.8 |
| Oregon | 30.6 | 32.4 | 30.3 | -1.0 | 20.6 | 26.3 |
| Colorado | 34.5 | 32.3 | 30.0 | -13.0 | 15.4 | 20.3 |
| Washington | 27.9 | 29.2 | 24.8 | -11.1 | 23.0 | 22.5 |
| Florida | 32.3 | 32.2 | 27.4 | -15.2 | 2.7 | 5.6 |
| US AVG | 31.0 | 30.6 | 28.2 | -9.0 | 9.9 | 13.4 |
"All Others" Mkt Share is combined share for all brewers below top 5: AB, MC, Crown, HUSA, Pabst. Per capita consumption data from Beer Institute. Brewery count, capita per brewery from Brewers Assn. Go To
Just a coupla weeks after Dogfish Head founder Sam Calagione went public in CBN seeking at least "transparency" when wholesalers have ownership stakes in craft brewers (see Jun 26 CBN), Brewers Assn has adopted a position statement calling for just that. "Transparency in Brewer-Distributor Relationships" notes the "significant risk" craft brewers take when appointing a distrib and need for mutual "trust and goodwill." Therefore, "our desire is for transparency so that a brewer entering an agreement with a distributor is aware of any direct or indirect ownership interest in any other brewery." Recall, Sam said such stakes make relationship "asymmetrical" and "pierce" 3-tier "integrity." Recall too, US' biggest distrib group, Reyes Holdings, told CBN that ownership stakes "tilt" the playing field and "only serve to weaken the three tier system."
A bit ironically, newest BA position statement joins others that support independence of distribs in 3-tier system and criticize big brewery branches, but also support "self- distribution" for small brewers, as well as direct sales to consumers. In fact, two of these position statements include language that "such right" or "such capability" is "not intended to bypass the three tier system," even as they explicitly do. So in effect, BA supports 3 independent tiers, while wanting to assure small brewers can be each of them. Of course, small brewers far from the first players to seek 3-tier carve outs.
Meanwhile, some distrib advocates speak of protecting "pure" 3-tier systems, especially as they work to pass anti-branch laws (sometimes with support of craft brewers). But veteran alc bev atty Richard Blau reminds: "No jurisdiction in America enforces a pure 3-tier system." To enforce that, you'd have to toss all brewpubs and farm wineries, he points out, which ain't gonna happen. Indeed, more and more such carve outs are being introduced and passed by state legislatures. On issue of distrib stakes in brewers, barring cross-interests would be "untenable and counter-productive," Richard believes, given impossibility of "policing" financial interests in a global economy and the fact that such a system could cut off capital to "struggling industry members at times when they need it most." Certainly AB would argue some of its interests fit the latter situation. And one distrib who owns piece of craft brewer told CBN that his investment happened when brewer just started up, desperately needed money and for the first 6-7 years he "thought it was a waste of time" and money.
Richard does second Sam on transparency, which he calls "a must…. There is no reasonable argument against Sam Calagione's contention that transparency will reduce the risks of unfairness. Cross-tier interests in some cases may produce 'asymmetrical relationships,' but transparency at least puts the third-party on notice so that contractual protections can be put into place to reduce 'sibling rivalry' by assuring equal attention to brands, protection of confidential or proprietary information, etc."
Richard suggests that distributor stakes should perhaps be allowed "when they are kept small" and would have to be "liquidated" if the small brewer gets to a certain size, kind of like volume caps for other exceptions. That would be a valuation challenge, but doable, Richard believes. Bigger issue may be erosion of 3-tier that such exemptions bring about. "Large manufacturers might reasonably cry foul for not having an equal opportunity" to invest in distribs, Richard suggests. Then too, "large, multi-state retailers that find current alcohol laws too constraining might welcome the further dilution of traditional regulation. And the wholesalers? They just might find themselves in a dilemma - wanting the additional opportunities, but fearing the further unwinding of their cherished three-tier system. Which harkens us to the shibboleth: Be careful what we wish for…"
Big Craft Brewpub Chains with Big Plans
Have a great 4th of July weekend!

